[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <C2D7FE5348E1B147BCA15975FBA23075013A592551@us01wembx1.internal.synopsys.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2018 23:42:41 +0000
From: Vineet Gupta <vineet.gupta1@...opsys.com>
To: "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@...linux.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
CC: Elvira Khabirova <lineprinter@...linux.org>,
Alexey Brodkin <alexey.brodkin@...opsys.com>,
"linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/13 v2] Move EM_ARCOMPACT and EM_ARCV2 to
uapi/linux/elf-em.h
On 11/9/18 3:33 PM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> These should never have been defined in the arch tree to begin with, and
> now uapi/linux/audit.h header is going to use EM_ARCOMPACT and EM_ARCV2 in
> order to define AUDIT_ARCH_ARCOMPACT and AUDIT_ARCH_ARCV2 which are needed
> to implement syscall_get_arch() which in turn is required to extend the
> generic ptrace API with PTRACE_GET_SYSCALL_INFO request.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry V. Levin <ldv@...linux.org>
> ---
> v2: do not add EM_ARC, move EM_ARCOMPACT and EM_ARCV2 instead.
>
> arch/arc/include/asm/elf.h | 6 +-----
> include/uapi/linux/elf-em.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arc/include/asm/elf.h b/arch/arc/include/asm/elf.h
> index aa2d6da9d187..2b80c184c9c8 100644
> --- a/arch/arc/include/asm/elf.h
> +++ b/arch/arc/include/asm/elf.h
> @@ -10,13 +10,9 @@
> #define __ASM_ARC_ELF_H
>
> #include <linux/types.h>
> +#include <linux/elf-em.h>
> #include <uapi/asm/elf.h>
>
> -/* These ELF defines belong to uapi but libc elf.h already defines them */
> -#define EM_ARCOMPACT 93
> -
> -#define EM_ARCV2 195 /* ARCv2 Cores */
> -
> #define EM_ARC_INUSE (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ISA_ARCOMPACT) ? \
> EM_ARCOMPACT : EM_ARCV2)
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/elf-em.h b/include/uapi/linux/elf-em.h
> index ba3696e3d694..91b33833630b 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/elf-em.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/elf-em.h
> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
> #define EM_M32R 88 /* Renesas M32R */
> #define EM_MN10300 89 /* Panasonic/MEI MN10300, AM33 */
> #define EM_OPENRISC 92 /* OpenRISC 32-bit embedded processor */
> +#define EM_ARCOMPACT 93 /* ARCompact processor */
> #define EM_BLACKFIN 106 /* ADI Blackfin Processor */
> #define EM_ALTERA_NIOS2 113 /* Altera Nios II soft-core processor */
> #define EM_TI_C6000 140 /* TI C6X DSPs */
> @@ -42,6 +43,7 @@
> #define EM_TILEPRO 188 /* Tilera TILEPro */
> #define EM_MICROBLAZE 189 /* Xilinx MicroBlaze */
> #define EM_TILEGX 191 /* Tilera TILE-Gx */
> +#define EM_ARCV2 195 /* ARCv2 Cores */
> #define EM_RISCV 243 /* RISC-V */
> #define EM_BPF 247 /* Linux BPF - in-kernel virtual machine */
> #define EM_FRV 0x5441 /* Fujitsu FR-V */
Seems OK in theory - but now we are exporting these to uapi and per my original
comment there were redef errors with libc elf.h atleast. Perhaps this being a
different header might be OK !
Acked-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists