[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181109075238.GA27578@lst.de>
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2018 08:52:38 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Guo Ren <ren_guo@...ky.com>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: move the arm arch_dma_alloc implementation to common code
Can I get a quick review from the arm64 folks? I think it should
be fine there as it basically is a code move, but an additional pair
or two of eyes always helps to weed out bugs.
On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 01:19:22PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> this series moves the existing arm64 implementation of arch_dma_alloc and
> arch_dma_free to common code given that it is not arm64-specific, and
> then also uses it for csky. Given how many architectures remap memory
> for the DMA coherent implementation it should be usable for many more,
> and the new cache flushing hook and the generic atomic pool are also
> enablers for implementing the IOMMU API dma ops in common code in a
> follow on series.
> _______________________________________________
> iommu mailing list
> iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
---end quoted text---
Powered by blists - more mailing lists