[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5FBCBE569E134E4CA167B91C0A77FD610198F8A65C@EXMBX-SZMAIL022.tencent.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2018 05:43:30 +0000
From: chouryzhou(周威) <chouryzhou@...cent.com>
To: tkjos <tkjos@...gle.com>
CC: gregkh <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, arve <arve@...roid.com>,
tkjos <tkjos@...roid.com>, akpm <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
dave <dave@...olabs.net>, devel <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
chouryzhou <chouryzhou@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH V3] binder: ipc namespace support for android
binder(Internet mail)
> >
> > If IPC_NS is disabled, "current-nsporxy->ipc_ns" will also exists, it will be a static
> > reference of "init_ipc_ns" (in ipc/msgutil.c, not defined in binder.c by me) with
> > no namespace-ization. You will get the same one in all processes, everything is
> > the same as without this patch.
>
> except, as far as I can tell, binder_init_ns() would never have been
> called on it so the mutex and list heads are not initialized so its
> completely broken. Am I missing something? How do those fields get
> initialized in this case?
> @@ -5832,8 +5888,12 @@ static int __init binder_init(void)
> goto err_init_binder_device_failed;
> }
>
> - return ret;
> + ret = binder_init_ns(&init_ipc_ns);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err_init_namespace_failed;
>
> + return ret;
They are initialized here.
- choury -
Powered by blists - more mailing lists