[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181112061337.GG21824@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2018 22:13:37 -0800
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Arun KS <arunks@...eaurora.org>
Cc: keescook@...omium.org, khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru,
minchan@...nel.org, getarunks@...il.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mhocko@...nel.org, vbabka@...e.cz, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, vatsa@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] mm: reference totalram_pages and managed_pages
once per function
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 11:37:46AM +0530, Arun KS wrote:
> +++ b/arch/um/kernel/mem.c
> @@ -51,8 +51,7 @@ void __init mem_init(void)
>
> /* this will put all low memory onto the freelists */
> memblock_free_all();
> - max_low_pfn = totalram_pages;
> - max_pfn = totalram_pages;
> + max_pfn = max_low_pfn = totalram_pages;
We don't normally do "a = b = c". How about:
max_low_pfn = totalram_pages;
- max_pfn = totalram_pages;
+ max_pfn = max_low_pfn;
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c
> @@ -434,9 +434,10 @@ static ssize_t microcode_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
> size_t len, loff_t *ppos)
> {
> ssize_t ret = -EINVAL;
> + unsigned long totalram_pgs = totalram_pages;
Can't we use a better variable name here? Even nr_pages would look
better to me.
> +++ b/drivers/hv/hv_balloon.c
> + unsigned long totalram_pgs = totalram_pages;
Ditto
> +++ b/fs/file_table.c
> + unsigned long totalram_pgs = totalram_pages;
... throughout, I guess.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists