[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a40d8c9e5c0c3c412d347a24a7c66010@codeaurora.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 11:57:17 +0530
From: Arun KS <arunks@...eaurora.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: keescook@...omium.org, khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru,
minchan@...nel.org, getarunks@...il.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mhocko@...nel.org, vbabka@...e.cz, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, vatsa@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] mm: reference totalram_pages and managed_pages
once per function
Hello Matthew,
Thanks for reviewing.
On 2018-11-12 11:43, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 11:37:46AM +0530, Arun KS wrote:
>> +++ b/arch/um/kernel/mem.c
>> @@ -51,8 +51,7 @@ void __init mem_init(void)
>>
>> /* this will put all low memory onto the freelists */
>> memblock_free_all();
>> - max_low_pfn = totalram_pages;
>> - max_pfn = totalram_pages;
>> + max_pfn = max_low_pfn = totalram_pages;
>
> We don't normally do "a = b = c". How about:
>
> max_low_pfn = totalram_pages;
> - max_pfn = totalram_pages;
> + max_pfn = max_low_pfn;
Point taken. Will fix it.
>
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c
>> @@ -434,9 +434,10 @@ static ssize_t microcode_write(struct file *file,
>> const char __user *buf,
>> size_t len, loff_t *ppos)
>> {
>> ssize_t ret = -EINVAL;
>> + unsigned long totalram_pgs = totalram_pages;
>
> Can't we use a better variable name here? Even nr_pages would look
> better to me.
Looks better.
Regards,
Arun
>
>> +++ b/drivers/hv/hv_balloon.c
>> + unsigned long totalram_pgs = totalram_pages;
>
> Ditto
>
>> +++ b/fs/file_table.c
>> + unsigned long totalram_pgs = totalram_pages;
>
> ... throughout, I guess.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists