[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <154213205843.88331.7023190778461777093@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 10:00:58 -0800
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@...iatek.com>,
Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
Weijie Gao <weijie.gao@...iatek.com>,
Roy Luo <cheng-hao.luo@...iatek.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>, kernel@...gutronix.de,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [resend PATCH 1/3] pwm: mediatek: drop flag 'has_clks'
Quoting Uwe Kleine-König (2018-11-13 01:52:10)
>
> I wonder if it would make sense to introduce functions like:
>
> struct clk *clk_get_optional(struct device *dev, const char *id)
>
> that return NULL instead of ERR_PTR(-ENODEV).
>
> Then the above would simplify to:
>
> pc->clks[i] = devm_clk_get_optional(&pdev->dev, mtk_pwm_clk_name[i]);
> if (IS_ERR(pc->clks[i]) {
> if (PTR_ERR(pc->clks[i]) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> dev_err(...);
> return PTR_ERR(pc->clks[i]);
> }
>
> (added the clk people to Cc for this question).
>
Such a patch is already on the list and not getting much review.
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1535724443-21150-1-git-send-email-phil.edworthy@renesas.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists