[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VduXH0OKcD2AyR03eNrWW8bKGL-ijfQocfQ+MDCAq0yag@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 16:04:26 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
Cc: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
USB <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
"Krogerus, Heikki" <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
rogerq@...com, Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/5] extcon: Return -EPROBE_DEFER when extcon device is
not found
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 1:17 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 1:05 PM Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com> wrote:
> > > Changing NULL to -ENODEV is a trading bad to worse.
> P.S. I still disagree with your arguments in relation to de facto use of an API.
I spoke to colleagues of mine and they are agree that semantically
-EPROBE_DEFER is a wrong error code from API that matches against some
list.
On the other hand, they agree with me that changing NULL to -ENODEV is
a trading bad to worse.
So, I withdraw mine complaints against API.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists