linux-kernel - Re: Official Linux system wrapper library?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 14 Nov 2018 18:47:57 +0000
From:   Joseph Myers <joseph@...esourcery.com>
To:     Daniel Colascione <dancol@...gle.com>
CC:     Szabolcs Nagy <Szabolcs.Nagy@....com>,
        Dave P Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>, nd <nd@....com>,
        Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
        "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>,
        Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
        Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Carlos O'Donell <carlos@...hat.com>,
        "libc-alpha@...rceware.org" <libc-alpha@...rceware.org>
Subject: Re: Official Linux system wrapper library?

On Wed, 14 Nov 2018, Daniel Colascione wrote:

> A good demonstration of a new commitment to pragmatism would be
> merging the trivial wrappers for gettid(2).

I support the addition of gettid (for use with those syscalls that take 
tids, and with appropriate documentation explaining the properties of 
tids) - and, generally, wrappers for all non-obsolescent 
architecture-independent Linux kernel syscalls, including ones that are 
very Linux-specific, except maybe for a few interfaces fundamentally 
inconsistent with glibc managing TLS etc. - they are, at least, no worse 
as a source of APIs than all the old BSD / SVID interfaces we have from 
when those were used as sources of APIs.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@...esourcery.com