[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e00c50de-f24e-5ff4-6a5b-0e8e0b918ddb@amd.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 20:07:07 +0000
From: "Moger, Babu" <Babu.Moger@....com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
CC: "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>,
"fenghua.yu@...el.com" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
"reinette.chatre@...el.com" <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"mchehab+samsung@...nel.org" <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"kstewart@...uxfoundation.org" <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
"pombredanne@...b.com" <pombredanne@...b.com>,
"rafael@...nel.org" <rafael@...nel.org>,
"kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
"tony.luck@...el.com" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"qianyue.zj@...baba-inc.com" <qianyue.zj@...baba-inc.com>,
"xiaochen.shen@...el.com" <xiaochen.shen@...el.com>,
"pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"Singh, Brijesh" <brijesh.singh@....com>,
"Hurwitz, Sherry" <sherry.hurwitz@....com>,
"dwmw2@...radead.org" <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
"Lendacky, Thomas" <Thomas.Lendacky@....com>,
"luto@...nel.org" <luto@...nel.org>,
"joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>,
"jannh@...gle.com" <jannh@...gle.com>,
"vkuznets@...hat.com" <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
"rian@...m.mit.edu" <rian@...m.mit.edu>,
"jpoimboe@...hat.com" <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 03/13] arch/x86: Re-arrange RDT init code
Boris,
On 11/14/18 1:05 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 08:52:29PM +0000, Moger, Babu wrote:
>> Separate the call sequence for rdt_quirks and MBA feature.
>> This is in preparation to handle vendor differences in these
>> call sequences.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++------
>> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl.c
>> index 5d526dc45751..fd5320dddddc 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl.c
>> @@ -794,6 +794,16 @@ static bool __init rdt_cpu_has(int flag)
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> +static __init bool rdt_mba_config(void)
>> +{
>> + if (rdt_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_MBA)) {
>> + if (rdt_get_mem_config(&rdt_resources_all[RDT_RESOURCE_MBA]))
>> + return true;
>
> Or simpler:
>
> if (rdt_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_MBA))
> return rdt_get_mem_config(&rdt_resources_all[RDT_RESOURCE_MBA]);
>
> return false;
>
> as rdt_get_mem_config() already returns bool.
>
Yes. We could do that. Will modify it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists