lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56649a0c-ea14-62fa-d81e-0d9b9da1d10f@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 15 Nov 2018 16:04:48 +0100
From:   Laurent Vivier <lvivier@...hat.com>
To:     Satheesh Rajendran <sathnaga@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:     Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Satheesh Rajendran <satheera@...ibm.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Michael Bringmann <mwb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Nathan Fontenot <nfont@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/numa: fix hot-added CPU on memory-less node

On 15/11/2018 10:19, Satheesh Rajendran wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 06:03:19PM +0100, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>> Trying to hotplug a CPU on an empty NUMA node (without
>> memory or CPU) crashes the kernel when the CPU is onlined.
>>
>> During the onlining process, the kernel calls start_secondary()
>> that ends by calling
>> set_numa_mem(local_memory_node(numa_cpu_lookup_table[cpu]))
>> that relies on NODE_DATA(nid)->node_zonelists and in our case
>> NODE_DATA(nid) is NULL.
>>
>> To fix that, add the same checking as we already have in
>> find_and_online_cpu_nid(): if NODE_DATA() is NULL, use
>> the first online node.
>>
>> Bug: https://github.com/linuxppc/linux/issues/184
>> Fixes: ea05ba7c559c8e5a5946c3a94a2a266e9a6680a6
>>        (powerpc/numa: Ensure nodes initialized for hotplug)
>> Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@...hat.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c | 9 +++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> 
> This patch causes regression for cold plug numa case(Case 1) and 
> hotplug case + reboot(Case 2) with adding all vcpus into node 0.
> 
> 
> Env: HW: Power8 Host.
> Kernel: 4.20-rc2 + this patch
> 
> Case 1:
> 1. boot a guest with 8 vcpus(all available), spreadout in 4 numa nodes.
> <vcpu placement='static'>8</vcpu>
> ...
>    <numa>
>       <cell id='0' cpus='0-1' memory='4194304' unit='KiB'/>
>       <cell id='1' cpus='2-3' memory='4194304' unit='KiB'/>
>       <cell id='2' cpus='4-5' memory='0' unit='KiB'/>
>       <cell id='3' cpus='6-7' memory='0' unit='KiB'/>
>     </numa>
> 
> 2. Check lscpu --- all vcpus are added to node0 --> NOK
> 
> # lscpu
...
> NUMA node0 CPU(s):   0-7
> NUMA node1 CPU(s):   
> NUMA node2 CPU(s):   
> NUMA node3 CPU(s): 
> 
> without this patch it was working fine.
> # lscpu
...
> NUMA node0 CPU(s):   0,1
> NUMA node1 CPU(s):   2,3
> NUMA node2 CPU(s):   4,5
> NUMA node3 CPU(s):   6,7
> 

Good point. Thank you.

I'm going to see what happens and how the cold case allows to online
CPUs on nodes with NODE_DATA() set to NULL (because it's what the patch
changes).

Thanks,
Laurent

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ