[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F7D459E55@ORSMSX110.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 19:40:44 +0000
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>
CC: "Jiang, Dave" <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
"ksummit-discuss@...ts.linuxfoundation.org"
<ksummit-discuss@...ts.linuxfoundation.org>,
"linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
"Verma, Vishal L" <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"zwisler@...nel.org" <zwisler@...nel.org>
Subject: RE: [Ksummit-discuss] [RFC PATCH 3/3] libnvdimm, MAINTAINERS:
Subsystem Profile
> I would recommend to remove this section at all.
> New maintainers won't come out of blue, but will be come
> from existing community and such individuals for sure will see
> and judge by themselves to whom they trust and to whom not.
Perhaps this is more of a hint to contributors than to maintainers
(see earlier discussion on who is the target audience for these documents).
It would help contributors know some names of useful reviewers (and
thus this list should be picked up by scripts/get_maintainer.pl to help
the user compose Cc: lists for e-mail patches).
-Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists