[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e4efcfd8c99ef197714230cb1eb246b39dc83151.camel@perches.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 11:43:51 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>
Cc: "Jiang, Dave" <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
"ksummit-discuss@...ts.linuxfoundation.org"
<ksummit-discuss@...ts.linuxfoundation.org>,
"linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
"Verma, Vishal L" <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"zwisler@...nel.org" <zwisler@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [RFC PATCH 3/3] libnvdimm, MAINTAINERS:
Subsystem Profile
On Thu, 2018-11-15 at 19:40 +0000, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > I would recommend to remove this section at all.
> > New maintainers won't come out of blue, but will be come
> > from existing community and such individuals for sure will see
> > and judge by themselves to whom they trust and to whom not.
>
> Perhaps this is more of a hint to contributors than to maintainers
> (see earlier discussion on who is the target audience for these documents).
>
> It would help contributors know some names of useful reviewers (and
> thus this list should be picked up by scripts/get_maintainer.pl to help
> the user compose Cc: lists for e-mail patches).
Trusted reviewers should be specifically listed
in the MAINTAINERS file with an "R:" entry.
get_maintainers should not look anywhere else.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists