lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c7c20cc5-c2a4-ce61-3d97-56c8acfb13ec@suse.cz>
Date:   Mon, 19 Nov 2018 17:46:03 +0100
From:   Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To:     Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc:     Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, pifang@...hat.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        aarcange@...hat.com, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
        Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: Memory hotplug softlock issue

On 11/19/18 5:46 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 19-11-18 17:36:21, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>>
>> So what protects us from locking a page whose refcount dropped to zero?
>> and is being freed? The checks in freeing path won't be happy about a
>> stray lock.
> 
> Nothing really prevents that. But does it matter. The worst that might
> happen is that we lock a freed or reused page. Who would complain?

free_pages_check() for example

PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_FREE includes PG_locked

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ