[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4f61bf5f-0aa8-df6e-109b-194b08f3374e@nvidia.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 21:34:06 +0000
From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>
CC: <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/4] ARM: tegra: Fix DRAM refresh-interval clobbering
on resume from LP1 on Tegra30
On 30/08/2018 19:54, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> The DRAM refresh-interval is getting erroneously set to "1" on exiting
> from memory self-refreshing mode. The clobbered interval causes the
> "refresh request overflow timeout" error raised by the External Memory
> Controller on exiting from LP1 on Tegra30.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-tegra/sleep-tegra30.S | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/sleep-tegra30.S b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/sleep-tegra30.S
> index 801fe58978ae..99ac9c6dcf7c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/sleep-tegra30.S
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/sleep-tegra30.S
> @@ -29,7 +29,6 @@
> #define EMC_CFG 0xc
> #define EMC_ADR_CFG 0x10
> #define EMC_TIMING_CONTROL 0x28
> -#define EMC_REFRESH 0x70
> #define EMC_NOP 0xdc
> #define EMC_SELF_REF 0xe0
> #define EMC_MRW 0xe8
> @@ -459,7 +458,6 @@ emc_wait_auto_cal_onetime:
> cmp r10, #TEGRA30
> streq r1, [r0, #EMC_NOP]
> streq r1, [r0, #EMC_NOP]
> - streq r1, [r0, #EMC_REFRESH]
>
> emc_device_mask r1, r0
This does look incorrect and it appears Tegra20 has the same bug.
However, looking at the EMC_REFRESH register it appears that bits 5:0
are the REFRESH_LO and bits 15:6 are the refresh interval. So this seems
to imply the interval is set to 0 and not 1. So maybe the commit message
needs to be fixed up.
The other question I have, should we be restoring the refresh value here
somewhere?
Cheers
Jon
--
nvpublic
Powered by blists - more mailing lists