linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 7/7] tpm: pass an array of tpm_bank_list structures to tpm_pcr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181119144256.GI8755@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 19 Nov 2018 16:42:56 +0200
From:   Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>
Cc:     zohar@...ux.ibm.com, david.safford@...com, monty.wiseman@...com,
        linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, silviu.vlasceanu@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 7/7] tpm: pass an array of tpm_bank_list structures to
 tpm_pcr_extend()

On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 09:22:32AM +0100, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> On 11/18/2018 8:29 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 04:55:36PM +0100, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> > > I understood from a previous email that you want to include all API
> > > changes for crypto agility in the same patch set.
> > 
> > Hmm.. maybe there is some misunderstading. Can you point me to the
> > comment? Thanks.
> 
> ---
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 03:24:46PM +0100, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> > Should I include the patch for tpm_pcr_extend() in this patch set, even
> > if the set fixes the digest size issue?
> 
> Just add some note to the cover letter. Makes sense here to have a
> prequel patch for that because otherwise the implementation will be
> a bit messy and half-baked.

Ok, I guess it is OK as long as IMA (namely Mimi) gives that patch
reviewed-by. It is not a huge change.

PS. I noticed that earlier patches have postfixes like '_struct' and
'_ptr' for function arguments. Can you remove them in the next version?

/Jarkko