Date:   Tue, 20 Nov 2018 19:40:16 +0000
From:   "Moger, Babu" <Babu.Moger@....com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
CC:     "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>,
        "fenghua.yu@...el.com" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
        "reinette.chatre@...el.com" <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
        "peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "mchehab+samsung@...nel.org" <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>,
        "arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
        "kstewart@...uxfoundation.org" <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "pombredanne@...b.com" <pombredanne@...b.com>,
        "rafael@...nel.org" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        "kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        "tony.luck@...el.com" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        "qianyue.zj@...baba-inc.com" <qianyue.zj@...baba-inc.com>,
        "xiaochen.shen@...el.com" <xiaochen.shen@...el.com>,
        "pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        "Singh, Brijesh" <brijesh.singh@....com>,
        "Hurwitz, Sherry" <sherry.hurwitz@....com>,
        "dwmw2@...radead.org" <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        "Lendacky, Thomas" <Thomas.Lendacky@....com>,
        "luto@...nel.org" <luto@...nel.org>,
        "joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>,
        "jannh@...gle.com" <jannh@...gle.com>,
        "vkuznets@...hat.com" <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        "rian@...m.mit.edu" <rian@...m.mit.edu>,
        "jpoimboe@...hat.com" <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v8 11/13] arch/resctrl: Introduce QOS feature for AMD

Boris,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2018 6:16 AM
> To: Moger, Babu <Babu.Moger@....com>
> Cc: tglx@...utronix.de; mingo@...hat.com; corbet@....net;
> fenghua.yu@...el.com; reinette.chatre@...el.com; peterz@...radead.org;
> gregkh@...uxfoundation.org; davem@...emloft.net; akpm@...ux-
> foundation.org; hpa@...or.com; x86@...nel.org;
> mchehab+samsung@...nel.org; arnd@...db.de;
> kstewart@...uxfoundation.org; pombredanne@...b.com;
> rafael@...nel.org; kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com; tony.luck@...el.com;
> qianyue.zj@...baba-inc.com; xiaochen.shen@...el.com;
> pbonzini@...hat.com; Singh, Brijesh <brijesh.singh@....com>; Hurwitz,
> Sherry <sherry.hurwitz@....com>; dwmw2@...radead.org; Lendacky,
> Thomas <Thomas.Lendacky@....com>; luto@...nel.org; joro@...tes.org;
> jannh@...gle.com; vkuznets@...hat.com; rian@...m.mit.edu;
> jpoimboe@...hat.com; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-
> doc@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 11/13] arch/resctrl: Introduce QOS feature for AMD
> 
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 08:54:43PM +0000, Moger, Babu wrote:
> > Enables QOS feature on AMD.
> 
> From Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst:
> 
> "Describe your changes in imperative mood, e.g. "make xyzzy do frotz"
> instead of "[This patch] makes xyzzy do frotz" or "[I] changed xyzzy
> to do frotz", as if you are giving orders to the codebase to change
> its behaviour."

Ok. Sure.
 
> > Following QoS sub-features are supported in AMD if the underlying
> > hardware supports it.
> >  - L3 Cache allocation enforcement
> >  - L3 Cache occupancy monitoring
> >  - L3 Code-Data Prioritization support
> >  - Memory Bandwidth Enforcement(Allocation)
> >
> > The specification for this feature is available at
> > https://developer.amd.com/wp-content/resources/56375.pdf
> 
> I hope that URL is stable.
Yes. It is.
> 
> > There are differences in the way some of the features are implemented.
> > Separate those functions and add those as vendor specific functions.
> > The major difference is in MBA feature.
> >  - AMD uses CPUID leaf 0x80000020 to initialize the MBA features.
> >  - AMD uses direct bandwidth value instead of delay based on bandwidth
> >    values.
> >  - MSR register base addresses are different for MBA.
> >  - Also AMD allows non-contiguous L3 cache bit masks.
> >
> > Adds following functions to take care of the differences.
> > rdt_get_mem_config_amd : MBA initialization function
> > parse_bw_amd : Bandwidth parsing
> > mba_wrmsr_amd: Writes bandwidth value
> > cbm_validate_amd : L3 cache bitmask validation
> 
> This paragraph is not needed - what you do is visible in the patch
> itself.
Ok. Will remove.
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl.c             | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl.h             |  5 ++
> >  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl_ctrlmondata.c | 70
> +++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  3 files changed, 141 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl.c
> > index 3f26c7c114e7..0d700ab7fcf9 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl.c
> > @@ -61,6 +61,9 @@ mba_wrmsr_intel(struct rdt_domain *d, struct
> msr_param *m,
> >  		struct rdt_resource *r);
> >  static void
> >  cat_wrmsr(struct rdt_domain *d, struct msr_param *m, struct
> rdt_resource *r);
> > +static void
> > +mba_wrmsr_amd(struct rdt_domain *d, struct msr_param *m,
> > +	      struct rdt_resource *r);
> >
> >  #define domain_init(id) LIST_HEAD_INIT(rdt_resources_all[id].domains)
> >
> > @@ -280,6 +283,31 @@ static bool rdt_get_mem_config(struct
> rdt_resource *r)
> >  	return true;
> >  }
> >
> > +static bool rdt_get_mem_config_amd(struct rdt_resource *r)
> > +{
> > +	union cpuid_0x10_3_eax eax;
> > +	union cpuid_0x10_x_edx edx;
> > +	u32 ebx, ecx;
> > +
> > +	cpuid_count(0x80000020, 1, &eax.full, &ebx, &ecx, &edx.full);
> > +	r->num_closid = edx.split.cos_max + 1;
> > +	r->default_ctrl = MAX_MBA_BW_AMD;
> > +
> > +	/* AMD does not use delay. Set delay_linear to false by default */
> 
> You don't need to write in the comment *what* you do - that's obvious.
> "AMD does not use delay" is more than enough.

Ok.

> 
> > +	r->membw.delay_linear = false;
> > +
> > +	/* FIX ME - May need to be read from MSR */
> 
> FIX ME?
We don’t need fix me here. We are not going to read from MSR.  I will drop it.
> 
> > +	r->membw.min_bw = 0;
> > +	r->membw.bw_gran = 1;
> > +	/* Max value is 2048, Data width should be 4 in decimal */
> > +	r->data_width = 4;
> > +
> > +	r->alloc_capable = true;
> > +	r->alloc_enabled = true;
> > +
> > +	return true;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static void rdt_get_cache_alloc_cfg(int idx, struct rdt_resource *r)
> >  {
> >  	union cpuid_0x10_1_eax eax;
> > @@ -339,6 +367,16 @@ static int get_cache_id(int cpu, int level)
> >  	return -1;
> >  }
> >
> > +static void
> > +mba_wrmsr_amd(struct rdt_domain *d, struct msr_param *m, struct
> rdt_resource *r)
> > +{
> > +	unsigned int i;
> > +
> > +	/*  Write the bw values for mba. */
> 
> That's an obvious comment. Drop it.
Ok.
> 
> > +	for (i = m->low; i < m->high; i++)
> > +		wrmsrl(r->msr_base + i, d->ctrl_val[i]);
> > +}
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * Map the memory b/w percentage value to delay values
> >   * that can be written to QOS_MSRs.
> > @@ -792,8 +830,12 @@ static bool __init rdt_cpu_has(int flag)
> >
> >  static __init bool rdt_mba_config(void)
> >  {
> > -	if (rdt_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_MBA))
> > -		return
> rdt_get_mem_config(&rdt_resources_all[RDT_RESOURCE_MBA]);
> > +	if (rdt_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_MBA)) {
> 
> Save yourself an indentation level:
Ok.
> 
> 	if (!rdt_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_MBA))
> 		return false;
> 
> 	if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_INTEL)
> 		...
Ok.  Got it.
> 
> 
> > +			return
> rdt_get_mem_config(&rdt_resources_all[RDT_RESOURCE_MBA]);
> > +		else if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD)
> > +			return
> rdt_get_mem_config_amd(&rdt_resources_all[RDT_RESOURCE_MBA]);
> > +	}
> >
> >  	return false;
> >  }
> 
> ...
> 
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl.h
> > index 102bcffbefd7..54ba21b7de2c 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl.h
> > @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
> >  #define IA32_L3_CBM_BASE	0xc90
> >  #define IA32_L2_CBM_BASE	0xd10
> >  #define IA32_MBA_THRTL_BASE	0xd50
> > +#define IA32_MBA_BW_BASE	0xc0000200
> 
> 	MSR_...
Ok.
> 
> >
> >  #define IA32_QM_CTR		0x0c8e
> >  #define IA32_QM_EVTSEL		0x0c8d
> > @@ -34,6 +35,7 @@
> >  #define MAX_MBA_BW			100u
> >  #define MBA_IS_LINEAR			0x4
> >  #define MBA_MAX_MBPS			U32_MAX
> > +#define MAX_MBA_BW_AMD			0x800
> >
> >  #define RMID_VAL_ERROR			BIT_ULL(63)
> >  #define RMID_VAL_UNAVAIL		BIT_ULL(62)
> > @@ -448,6 +450,8 @@ int parse_cbm(struct rdt_parse_data *data, struct
> rdt_resource *r,
> >  	      struct rdt_domain *d);
> >  int parse_bw_intel(struct rdt_parse_data *data, struct rdt_resource *r,
> >  		   struct rdt_domain *d);
> > +int parse_bw_amd(struct rdt_parse_data *data, struct rdt_resource *r,
> > +		 struct rdt_domain *d);
> >
> >  extern struct mutex rdtgroup_mutex;
> >
> > @@ -579,5 +583,6 @@ void cqm_handle_limbo(struct work_struct *work);
> >  bool has_busy_rmid(struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdt_domain *d);
> >  void __check_limbo(struct rdt_domain *d, bool force_free);
> >  bool cbm_validate_intel(char *buf, u32 *data, struct rdt_resource *r);
> > +bool cbm_validate_amd(char *buf, u32 *data, struct rdt_resource *r);
> >
> >  #endif /* _ASM_X86_RESCTRL_H */
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl_ctrlmondata.c
> b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl_ctrlmondata.c
> > index 71aa1d971430..b6ceb4db9322 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl_ctrlmondata.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl_ctrlmondata.c
> > @@ -28,6 +28,52 @@
> >  #include <linux/slab.h>
> >  #include "resctrl.h"
> >
> > +/*
> > + * Check whether MBA bandwidth percentage value is correct. The value
> is
> > + * checked against the minimum and max bandwidth values specified by
> the
> 
> Either write "min" and "max" or write them both out fully.

Ok
> 
> > + * hardware. The allocated bandwidth percentage is rounded to the next
> > + * control step available on the hardware.
> > + */
> > +static bool bw_validate_amd(char *buf, unsigned long *data,
> > +			    struct rdt_resource *r)
> > +{
> > +	unsigned long bw;
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	ret = kstrtoul(buf, 10, &bw);
> > +	if (ret) {
> > +		rdt_last_cmd_printf("Non-decimal digit in MB value %s\n",
> buf);
> > +		return false;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	if (bw < r->membw.min_bw || bw > r->default_ctrl) {
> > +		rdt_last_cmd_printf("MB value %ld out of range [%d,%d]\n",
> bw,
> > +				    r->membw.min_bw, r->default_ctrl);
> > +		return false;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	*data = roundup(bw, (unsigned long)r->membw.bw_gran);
> > +	return true;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int parse_bw_amd(struct rdt_parse_data *data, struct rdt_resource *r,
> > +		 struct rdt_domain *d)
> > +{
> > +	unsigned long bw_val;
> > +
> > +	if (d->have_new_ctrl) {
> > +		rdt_last_cmd_printf("duplicate domain %d\n", d->id);
> 
> Start with a capital letter: "Duplicate domain..."
ok
> 
> And looking at the rest, some of them start with a capital letter and
> some of them not. Please unify that in a separate patch.

Yes, I see it. I will fix all the rdt_last_cmd_printf texts.

> 
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	if (!bw_validate_amd(data->buf, &bw_val, r))
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> 
> <---- newline here.
Ok.
> 
> > +	d->new_ctrl = bw_val;
> > +	d->have_new_ctrl = true;
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * Check whether MBA bandwidth percentage value is correct. The value is
> >   * checked against the minimum and max bandwidth values specified by
> the
> 
> --
> Regards/Gruss,
>     Boris.
> 
> Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists