[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181120111248.GW10650@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 13:12:48 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@...esas.com>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Ungerer <gerg@...ux-m68k.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Paul Burton <paul.burton@...s.com>,
James Hogan <jhogan@...nel.org>,
Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>,
Huacai Chen <chenhc@...ote.com>, Guan Xuetao <gxt@....edu.cn>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
"linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org" <linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org>,
"linux-mips@...ux-mips.org" <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: Add (devm_)clk_get_optional() functions
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 10:53:33AM +0000, Phil Edworthy wrote:
> On 20 November 2018 10:39 Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 02:12:59PM +0000, Phil Edworthy wrote:
> > > This adds clk_get_optional() and devm_clk_get_optional() functions to
> > > get optional clocks.
> > > They behave the same as (devm_)clk_get except where there is no clock
> > > producer. In this case, instead of returning -ENOENT, the function
> > > returns NULL. This makes error checking simpler and allows
> > > clk_prepare_enable, etc to be called on the returned reference without
> > > additional checks.
> > > - Instead of messing with the core functions, simply wrap them for the
> > > _optional() versions. By putting clk_get_optional() inline in the header
> > > file, we can get rid of the arch specific patches as well.
> > Fine if it would have no surprises with error handling.
> There shouldn't be any surprises. My earlier attempts at implementing this
> were hampered by the fact that of_clk_get_by_name() can return -EINVAL
> in some circumstances. By directly wrapping the (devm_)clk_get() functions
> that problem goes away.
Good!
After my comments being addressed,
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> > > + if (ERR_PTR(-ENOENT))
> Huh? That wasn't the code I sent...
Yup, it's my wrong editing flow. Anyway, you got the idea.
> > > + return NULL;
> > > + else
> > > + return clk;
> > return clk == ERR_PTR(-ENOENT) ? NULL : clk;
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists