[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181120120519.GE2527@zn.tnic>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 13:05:20 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: "Moger, Babu" <Babu.Moger@....com>
Cc: "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>,
"fenghua.yu@...el.com" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
"reinette.chatre@...el.com" <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"mchehab+samsung@...nel.org" <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"kstewart@...uxfoundation.org" <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
"pombredanne@...b.com" <pombredanne@...b.com>,
"rafael@...nel.org" <rafael@...nel.org>,
"kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
"tony.luck@...el.com" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"qianyue.zj@...baba-inc.com" <qianyue.zj@...baba-inc.com>,
"xiaochen.shen@...el.com" <xiaochen.shen@...el.com>,
"pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"Singh, Brijesh" <brijesh.singh@....com>,
"Hurwitz, Sherry" <sherry.hurwitz@....com>,
"dwmw2@...radead.org" <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
"Lendacky, Thomas" <Thomas.Lendacky@....com>,
"luto@...nel.org" <luto@...nel.org>,
"joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>,
"jannh@...gle.com" <jannh@...gle.com>,
"vkuznets@...hat.com" <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
"rian@...m.mit.edu" <rian@...m.mit.edu>,
"jpoimboe@...hat.com" <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 06/13] arch/resctrl: Initialize the resource functions
that are different
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 10:59:18AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> So I'm wondering: instead of having mba_wrmsr_intel() and
> mba_wrmsr_amd() and adding those per-vendor initialization functions,
> why don't you push down the vendor differentiation into mba_wrmsr()?
>
> Then in that function you do
>
> if (vendor == X86_VENDOR_INTEL)
> __mba_wrmsr_intel();
> else if (vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD)
> __mba_wrmsr_amd();
>
> and so on and then you don't have to do any of that initialization dance
> here and the struct rdt_resource assignment for the MBA will remain
> nicely similar to the other ones...
>
> Hmmm?
Yeah, after having look at the patchset further, that might not be a
good idea as you need to assign more per-vendor stuff than just an MSR
accessor function...
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists