[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bcd55324-1dc9-904e-d457-ebce7684712f@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 15:34:49 +0100
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Oscar Salvador <OSalvador@...e.com>,
Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...cle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] mm, memory_hotplug: deobfuscate migration part of
offlining
On 20.11.18 15:34, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 20-11-18 15:26:43, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> [...]
>>> + do {
>>> + for (pfn = start_pfn; pfn;)
>>> + {
>>
>> { on a new line looks weird.
>>
>>> + /* start memory hot removal */
>>> + ret = -EINTR;
>>
>> I think we can move that into the "if (signal_pending(current))"
>>
>> (if my eyes are not wrong, this will not be touched otherwise)
>
> Better?
>
> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> index 9cd161db3061..6bc3aee30f5e 100644
> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> @@ -1592,11 +1592,10 @@ static int __ref __offline_pages(unsigned long start_pfn,
> }
>
> do {
> - for (pfn = start_pfn; pfn;)
> - {
> + for (pfn = start_pfn; pfn;) {
> /* start memory hot removal */
> - ret = -EINTR;
> if (signal_pending(current)) {
> + ret = -EINTR;
> reason = "signal backoff";
> goto failed_removal_isolated;
> }
>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
:)
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists