linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] iommu/io-pgtable-arm-v7s: Use DMA32 zone for page tables

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181121213853.GL3065@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date:   Wed, 21 Nov 2018 13:38:53 -0800
From:   Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To:     Christopher Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc:     Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
        Levin Alexander <Alexander.Levin@...rosoft.com>,
        Huaisheng Ye <yehs1@...ovo.com>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, Yong Wu <yong.wu@...iatek.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...gle.com>, yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] iommu/io-pgtable-arm-v7s: Use DMA32 zone for page
 tables

On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 06:20:02PM +0000, Christopher Lameter wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Nov 2018, Nicolas Boichat wrote:
> 
> > This is a follow-up to the discussion in [1], to make sure that the page
> > tables allocated by iommu/io-pgtable-arm-v7s are contained within 32-bit
> > physical address space.
> 
> Page tables? This means you need a page frame? Why go through the slab
> allocators?

Because this particular architecture has sub-page-size PMD page tables.
We desperately need to hoist page table allocation out of the architectures;
there're a bunch of different implementations and they're mostly bad,
one way or another.

For each level of page table we generally have three cases:

1. single page
2. sub-page, naturally aligned
3. multiple pages, naturally aligned

for 1 and 3, the page allocator will do just fine.
for 2, we should have a per-MM page_frag allocator.  s390 already has
something like this, although it's more complicated.  ppc also has
something a little more complex for the cases when it's configured with
a 64k page size but wants to use a 4k page table entry.

I'd like x86 to be able to simply do:

#define pte_alloc_one(mm, addr)	page_alloc_table(mm, addr, 0)
#define pmd_alloc_one(mm, addr)	page_alloc_table(mm, addr, 0)
#define pud_alloc_one(mm, addr)	page_alloc_table(mm, addr, 0)
#define p4d_alloc_one(mm, addr)	page_alloc_table(mm, addr, 0)

An architecture with 4k page size and needing a 16k PMD would do:

#define pmd_alloc_one(mm, addr) page_alloc_table(mm, addr, 2)

while an architecture with a 64k page size needing a 4k PTE would do:

#define ARCH_PAGE_TABLE_FRAG
#define pte_alloc_one(mm, addr) pagefrag_alloc_table(mm, addr, 4096)

I haven't had time to work on this, but perhaps someone with a problem
that needs fixing would like to, instead of burying yet another awful
implementation away in arch/ somewhere.