lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181121224124.GB4016@andrea>
Date:   Wed, 21 Nov 2018 23:41:24 +0100
From:   Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@...rulasolutions.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [Question] smp_wmb() in prepare_uprobe()

Hi,

The comment for the smp_wmb() in prepare_uprobe() says:

  "pairs with rmb() in find_active_uprobe()"

but I see no (smp_)rmb() in find_active_uprobe(); I see the smp_rmb() in
handle_swbp(): is this the intended pairing barrier?

Which memory accesses do you want to "order" with this pairing?

Thanks,
  Andrea

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ