| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 09:16:08 +0000
From: Andy Tang <andy.tang@....com>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
"rui.zhang@...el.com" <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
"edubezval@...il.com" <edubezval@...il.com>
CC: "linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] thermal: qoriq: add multiple sensors support
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for your explanation. The problem is these two trees are not synced well.
Let's take our driver(qoriq_thermal.c) for example.
Git log on Rui's tree next branch:
2dfef65 thermal: qoriq: Switch to SPDX identifier
1a893a5 thermal: qoriq: Simplify the 'site' variable assignment
f1506a6 thermal: qoriq: Use devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register()
c30d5d5 thermal: qoriq: constify thermal_zone_of_device_ops structures
0e77488 thermal: qoriq: remove useless call for of_thermal_get_trip_points()
4352844 thermal: qoriq: Add thermal management support
Git log on linux-soc-thermal tree branch next:
6017e2a thermal: qoriq: add i.mx8mq support
9b96566 thermal: Convert to using %pOFn instead of device_node.name
c30d5d5 thermal: qoriq: constify thermal_zone_of_device_ops structures
0e77488 thermal: qoriq: remove useless call for of_thermal_get_trip_points()
4352844 thermal: qoriq: Add thermal management support
You can see that the first 2-3 commits on these two tress are different.
The strange thing is they seems sync well on Linus' tree:
0ef7791 Merge branch 'linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/evalenti/linux-soc-thermal
6017e2a thermal: qoriq: add i.mx8mq support
9b96566 thermal: Convert to using %pOFn instead of device_node.name
2dfef65 thermal: qoriq: Switch to SPDX identifier
1a893a5 thermal: qoriq: Simplify the 'site' variable assignment
f1506a6 thermal: qoriq: Use devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register()
c30d5d5 thermal: qoriq: constify thermal_zone_of_device_ops structures
0e77488 thermal: qoriq: remove useless call for of_thermal_get_trip_points()
4352844 thermal: qoriq: Add thermal management support
Currently my patch was created based on Run's tree, probably I should rebase it to soc tree.
But whichever tree I use, it can't be merged to Linus' tree without conflict.
Something I missed?
BR,
Andy
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
> Sent: 2018年11月21日 16:44
> To: Andy Tang <andy.tang@....com>; rui.zhang@...el.com;
> edubezval@...il.com
> Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] thermal: qoriq: add multiple sensors support
>
> On 21/11/2018 02:34, Andy Tang wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Do you have any comments on this patch?
> >
> > I found for our thermal driver(qoriq_thermal.c) there are different
> between the following two git trees:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rzhang/linux.git
> > branch: next
> >
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/evalenti/linux-soc-thermal.gi
> t.
> > branch: next
> >
> > Could you please clarify which git tree/branch should I use?
>
> SoC changes are submitted against linux-soc-thermal.git.
>
> Generic thermal framework are sent against Zhang Rui's tree but it
> happens sometimes Eduardo pick them also when the changes are related
> to SoC behavior.
>
> However, I agree that can be confusing :)
>
> Eduardo, Rui,
>
> how about to add a section in the maintainer handbook for the thermal to
> clarify the expectations and the flow?
>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Andy Tang
> >> Sent: 2018年11月14日 15:29
> >> To: rui.zhang@...el.com; daniel.lezcano@...aro.org
> >> Cc: edubezval@...il.com; linux-pm@...r.kernel.org;
> >> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> >> Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] thermal: qoriq: add multiple sensors support
> >>
> >> PING.
> >>
> >> BR,
> >> Andy
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: andy.tang@....com <andy.tang@....com>
> >>> Sent: 2018年10月30日 9:00
> >>> To: rui.zhang@...el.com; daniel.lezcano@...aro.org
> >>> Cc: edubezval@...il.com; linux-pm@...r.kernel.org;
> >>> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Andy Tang <andy.tang@....com>
> >>> Subject: [PATCH v3] thermal: qoriq: add multiple sensors support
> >>>
> >>> From: Yuantian Tang <andy.tang@....com>
> >>>
> >>> The QorIQ Layerscape SoC has several thermal sensors but the
> current
> >>> driver only supports one.
> >>>
> >>> Massage the code to be sensor oriented and allow the support for
> >>> multiple sensors.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Yuantian Tang <andy.tang@....com>
> >>> Reviewed-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
> >>> ---
> >>> v3:
> >>> - add Reviewed-by
> >>> v2:
> >>> - update the commit message
> >>> - refine the qoriq_tmu_register_tmu_zone()
> >>>
> >>> drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c | 100
> >>> ++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> >>> 1 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c
> >>> b/drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c index 450ed66..8beb344 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/qoriq_thermal.c
> >>> @@ -59,14 +59,21 @@ struct qoriq_tmu_regs {
> >>> u32 ttr3cr; /* Temperature Range 3 Control Register */
> >>> };
> >>>
> >>> +struct qoriq_tmu_data;
> >>> +
> >>> /*
> >>> * Thermal zone data
> >>> */
> >>> +struct qoriq_sensor {
> >>> + struct thermal_zone_device *tzd;
> >>> + struct qoriq_tmu_data *qdata;
> >>> + int id;
> >>> +};
> >>> +
> >>> struct qoriq_tmu_data {
> >>> - struct thermal_zone_device *tz;
> >>> struct qoriq_tmu_regs __iomem *regs;
> >>> - int sensor_id;
> >>> bool little_endian;
> >>> + struct qoriq_sensor *sensor[SITES_MAX];
> >>> };
> >>>
> >>> static void tmu_write(struct qoriq_tmu_data *p, u32 val, void
> >>> __iomem
> >>> *addr) @@ -87,48 +94,51 @@ static u32 tmu_read(struct
> >> qoriq_tmu_data
> >>> *p, void __iomem *addr)
> >>>
> >>> static int tmu_get_temp(void *p, int *temp) {
> >>> + struct qoriq_sensor *qsensor = p;
> >>> + struct qoriq_tmu_data *qdata = qsensor->qdata;
> >>> u32 val;
> >>> - struct qoriq_tmu_data *data = p;
> >>>
> >>> - val = tmu_read(data, &data->regs->site[data->sensor_id].tritsr);
> >>> + val = tmu_read(qdata, &qdata->regs->site[qsensor->id].tritsr);
> >>> *temp = (val & 0xff) * 1000;
> >>>
> >>> return 0;
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> -static int qoriq_tmu_get_sensor_id(void)
> >>> +static const struct thermal_zone_of_device_ops tmu_tz_ops = {
> >>> + .get_temp = tmu_get_temp,
> >>> +};
> >>> +
> >>> +static int qoriq_tmu_register_tmu_zone(struct platform_device
> >>> +*pdev)
> >>> {
> >>> - int ret, id;
> >>> - struct of_phandle_args sensor_specs;
> >>> - struct device_node *np, *sensor_np;
> >>> + struct qoriq_tmu_data *qdata = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> >>> + int id, sites = 0;
> >>>
> >>> - np = of_find_node_by_name(NULL, "thermal-zones");
> >>> - if (!np)
> >>> - return -ENODEV;
> >>> + for (id = 0; id < SITES_MAX; id++) {
> >>> + qdata->sensor[id] = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
> >>> + sizeof(struct qoriq_sensor), GFP_KERNEL);
> >>> + if (!qdata->sensor[id])
> >>> + return -ENOMEM;
> >>>
> >>> - sensor_np = of_get_next_child(np, NULL);
> >>> - ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(sensor_np,
> "thermal-sensors",
> >>> - "#thermal-sensor-cells",
> >>> - 0, &sensor_specs);
> >>> - if (ret) {
> >>> - of_node_put(np);
> >>> - of_node_put(sensor_np);
> >>> - return ret;
> >>> - }
> >>> + qdata->sensor[id]->id = id;
> >>> + qdata->sensor[id]->qdata = qdata;
> >>>
> >>> - if (sensor_specs.args_count >= 1) {
> >>> - id = sensor_specs.args[0];
> >>> - WARN(sensor_specs.args_count > 1,
> >>> - "%s: too many cells in sensor specifier %d\n",
> >>> - sensor_specs.np->name,
> sensor_specs.args_count);
> >>> - } else {
> >>> - id = 0;
> >>> - }
> >>> + qdata->sensor[id]->tzd =
> >>> devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(
> >>> + &pdev->dev, id, qdata->sensor[id], &tmu_tz_ops);
> >>> + if (IS_ERR(qdata->sensor[id]->tzd)) {
> >>> + if (PTR_ERR(qdata->sensor[id]->tzd) == -ENODEV)
> >>> + continue;
> >>> + else
> >>> + return PTR_ERR(qdata->sensor[id]->tzd);
> >>>
> >>> - of_node_put(np);
> >>> - of_node_put(sensor_np);
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + sites |= 0x1 << (15 - id);
> >>> + }
> >>> + /* Enable monitoring */
> >>> + if (sites != 0)
> >>> + tmu_write(qdata, sites | TMR_ME | TMR_ALPF,
> >>> &qdata->regs->tmr);
> >>>
> >>> - return id;
> >>> + return 0;
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> static int qoriq_tmu_calibration(struct platform_device *pdev) @@
> >>> -178,16 +188,11 @@ static void qoriq_tmu_init_device(struct
> >>> qoriq_tmu_data *data)
> >>> tmu_write(data, TMR_DISABLE, &data->regs->tmr); }
> >>>
> >>> -static const struct thermal_zone_of_device_ops tmu_tz_ops = {
> >>> - .get_temp = tmu_get_temp,
> >>> -};
> >>> -
> >>> static int qoriq_tmu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) {
> >>> int ret;
> >>> struct qoriq_tmu_data *data;
> >>> struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> >>> - u32 site;
> >>>
> >>> if (!np) {
> >>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Device OF-Node is NULL"); @@
> -203,13
> >>> +208,6 @@ static int qoriq_tmu_probe(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
> >>>
> >>> data->little_endian = of_property_read_bool(np, "little-endian");
> >>>
> >>> - data->sensor_id = qoriq_tmu_get_sensor_id();
> >>> - if (data->sensor_id < 0) {
> >>> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get sensor id\n");
> >>> - ret = -ENODEV;
> >>> - goto err_iomap;
> >>> - }
> >>> -
> >>> data->regs = of_iomap(np, 0);
> >>> if (!data->regs) {
> >>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get memory region\n");
> @@
> >>> -223,19 +221,13 @@ static int qoriq_tmu_probe(struct
> platform_device
> >>> *pdev)
> >>> if (ret < 0)
> >>> goto err_tmu;
> >>>
> >>> - data->tz = devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(&pdev->dev,
> >>> - data->sensor_id,
> >>> - data, &tmu_tz_ops);
> >>> - if (IS_ERR(data->tz)) {
> >>> - ret = PTR_ERR(data->tz);
> >>> - dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> >>> - "Failed to register thermal zone device %d\n", ret);
> >>> - goto err_tmu;
> >>> + ret = qoriq_tmu_register_tmu_zone(pdev);
> >>> + if (ret < 0) {
> >>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to register sensors\n");
> >>> + ret = -ENODEV;
> >>> + goto err_iomap;
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> - /* Enable monitoring */
> >>> - site = 0x1 << (15 - data->sensor_id);
> >>> - tmu_write(data, site | TMR_ME | TMR_ALPF, &data->regs->tmr);
> >>>
> >>> return 0;
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> 1.7.1
> >
>
>
> --
>
> <https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F
> www.linaro.org%2F&data=02%7C01%7Candy.tang%40nxp.com%7Ca0
> d265f95a424d33256b08d64f8d74c8%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c
> 301635%7C0%7C0%7C636783866299399290&sdata=AVw3XdjmiRO
> XP7Xz7MTNMVgzI8hYG9aWsR02opMZqjM%3D&reserved=0>
> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
>
> Follow Linaro:
> <https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F
> www.facebook.com%2Fpages%2FLinaro&data=02%7C01%7Candy.tan
> g%40nxp.com%7Ca0d265f95a424d33256b08d64f8d74c8%7C686ea1d3b
> c2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C636783866299399290&s
> data=NM8wm4ri%2F2kdBW0FdCSXrL5ogg6owPfoRGacqm%2BKsEw%3D&a
> mp;reserved=0> Facebook |
> <https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Ft
> witter.com%2F%23!%2Flinaroorg&data=02%7C01%7Candy.tang%40n
> xp.com%7Ca0d265f95a424d33256b08d64f8d74c8%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6
> fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C636783866299399290&sdata=
> Wplqwpisgmqrf3yLhTzdo5O6TvN2Jfu5IjBTvS4xOWk%3D&reserved=0>
> Twitter |
> <https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F
> www.linaro.org%2Flinaro-blog%2F&data=02%7C01%7Candy.tang%40
> nxp.com%7Ca0d265f95a424d33256b08d64f8d74c8%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c
> 6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C636783866299399290&sdata=I
> b6KFIP3LNPGuDDb1dpnOllrqAAsc%2BZNCUuJZUPso6k%3D&reserve
> d=0> Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists