[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1542792064.20593.2.camel@mtksdaap41>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 17:21:04 +0800
From: Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@...iatek.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
CC: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
<sboyd@...eaurora.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
<jamesjj.liao@...iatek.com>, <fan.chen@...iatek.com>,
linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
<srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>, <owen.chen@...iatek.com>,
<mars.cheng@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 04/11] soc: mediatek: add new flow for mtcmos power.
On Wed, 2018-11-21 at 00:07 -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Weiyi Lu (2018-11-19 18:37:34)
> > On Tue, 2018-11-13 at 11:31 -0800, Nicolas Boichat wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 10:42 PM Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@...iatek.com> wrote:
>
> > > > @@ -226,6 +397,7 @@ static int scpsys_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
> > > > if (ret < 0)
> > > > goto err_pwr_ack;
> > > >
> > > > +
> > >
> > > Drop this.
> > Why do we try to drop this? Once the power-on step fail, the following
> > steps should not be permitted.
>
> I just see a whitespace addition that doesn't do anything. I suspect
> it's a style nitpick and common practice to not include spurious diffs
> in the patch. So remove this hunk?
>
Oops! I missed the extra whitespace. I will remove it. Many thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists