[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1811211451250.1665@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 14:52:40 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
cc: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Casey Schaufler <casey.schaufler@...el.com>,
Asit Mallick <asit.k.mallick@...el.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>,
Waiman Long <longman9394@...il.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Dave Stewart <david.c.stewart@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [Patch v7 14/18] x86/speculation: Add 'seccomp' Spectre v2 app
to app protection mode
On Tue, 20 Nov 2018, Tim Chen wrote:
> According to software guidance:
>
> "Setting ... STIBP ... on a logical processor prevents the predicted
> targets of indirect branches on any logical processor of that core
> from being controlled by software that executes (or executed
> previously) on another logical processor of the same core."
>
> https://software.intel.com/security-software-guidance/insights/deep-dive-single-thread-indirect-branch-predictors
>
> Hence setting STIBP on a sandboxed task will prevent the task
> from attacking other sibling threads or getting attacked.
That's not sufficient, because you need an IBPB when the sandboxed task is
switched out.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists