[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181121135611.GA26411@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 14:56:11 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
WoodhouseDavid <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
SchauflerCasey <casey.schaufler@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 041/361] x86/speculation: Enable cross-hyperthread
spectre v2 STIBP mitigation
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 02:21:15PM +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Nov 2018, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>
> > 4.19-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>
> Greg, please drop this patch from all -stable for now. Version that
> wouldn't have such performance impact is being worked on.
Is it reverted in Linus's tree? If not, then anything that comes "later
on" will not apply here, right?
I see the thread asking about this, but I got really conflicting
messages here, and now it's in all of the latest releases, and no
testing seems to have uncovered issues. Is it just a "slow down"
problem?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists