linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] uprobes: Fix handle_swbp() vs. unregister() + register() race once more

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181122161942.GG28270@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 22 Nov 2018 17:19:42 +0100
From:   Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:     Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@...rulasolutions.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] uprobes: Fix handle_swbp() vs. unregister() + register()
 race once more

On 11/22, Andrea Parri wrote:
>
> Commit 142b18ddc8143 ("uprobes: Fix handle_swbp() vs unregister() +
> register() race") added the UPROBE_COPY_INSN flag, and corresponding
> smp_wmb() and smp_rmb() memory barriers, to ensure that handle_swbp()
> uses fully-initialized uprobes only.
> 
> However, the smp_rmb() is mis-placed: this barrier should be placed
> after handle_swbp() has tested for the flag, thus guaranteeing that
> (program-order) subsequent loads from the uprobe can see the initial
> stores performed by prepare_uprobe().
> 
> Move the smp_rmb() accordingly.  Also amend the comments associated
> to the two memory barriers to indicate their actual locations.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@...rulasolutions.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
> Cc: stable@...nel.org
> Fixes: 142b18ddc8143 ("uprobes: Fix handle_swbp() vs unregister() + register() race")

Thanks,

Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>



> ---
>  kernel/events/uprobes.c | 12 ++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> index 96d4bee83489b..322e97bbb4370 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> @@ -829,7 +829,7 @@ static int prepare_uprobe(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct file *file,
>  	BUG_ON((uprobe->offset & ~PAGE_MASK) +
>  			UPROBE_SWBP_INSN_SIZE > PAGE_SIZE);
>  
> -	smp_wmb(); /* pairs with rmb() in find_active_uprobe() */
> +	smp_wmb(); /* pairs with the smp_rmb() in handle_swbp() */
>  	set_bit(UPROBE_COPY_INSN, &uprobe->flags);
>  
>   out:
> @@ -2178,10 +2178,18 @@ static void handle_swbp(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  	 * After we hit the bp, _unregister + _register can install the
>  	 * new and not-yet-analyzed uprobe at the same address, restart.
>  	 */
> -	smp_rmb(); /* pairs with wmb() in install_breakpoint() */
>  	if (unlikely(!test_bit(UPROBE_COPY_INSN, &uprobe->flags)))
>  		goto out;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Pairs with the smp_wmb() in prepare_uprobe().
> +	 *
> +	 * Guarantees that if we see the UPROBE_COPY_INSN bit set, then
> +	 * we must also see the stores to &uprobe->arch performed by the
> +	 * prepare_uprobe() call.
> +	 */
> +	smp_rmb();
> +
>  	/* Tracing handlers use ->utask to communicate with fetch methods */
>  	if (!get_utask())
>  		goto out;
> -- 
> 2.17.1
>