[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181123135004.7fd1cd58@bbrezillon>
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2018 13:50:04 +0100
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>
To: vitor <vitor.soares@...opsys.com>
Cc: <wsa@...-dreams.de>, <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>, <corbet@....net>,
<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<arnd@...db.de>, <psroka@...ence.com>, <agolec@...ence.com>,
<adouglas@...ence.com>, <bfolta@...ence.com>, <dkos@...ence.com>,
<alicja@...ence.com>, <cwronka@...ence.com>, <sureshp@...ence.com>,
<rafalc@...ence.com>, <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>, <nm@...com>,
<robh+dt@...nel.org>, <pawel.moll@....com>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
<ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>, <galak@...eaurora.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<geert@...ux-m68k.org>, <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
<Xiang.Lin@...aptics.com>, <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
<nsekhar@...com>, <pgaj@...ence.com>, <peda@...ntia.se>,
<mshettel@...eaurora.org>, <swboyd@...omium.org>,
<joao.pinto@...opsys.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i3c: master: dw: split dw-i3c-master.c into master and
bus specific parts
On Fri, 23 Nov 2018 12:39:31 +0000
vitor <vitor.soares@...opsys.com> wrote:
> Hi Boris,
>
>
> On 22/11/18 20:02, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > On Thu, 22 Nov 2018 17:54:54 +0000
> > Vitor Soares <vitor.soares@...opsys.com> wrote:
> >
> >> From: Vitor Soares <soares@...opsys.com>
> >>
> >> This patch slipts dw-i3c-master.c into three pieces:
> >> dw-i3c-master.c - contains the code that interacts directly with the
> >> core in master mode.
> >>
> >> dw-i3c-platdrv.c - contains the code specific to the platform driver.
> >>
> >> dw-i3c-core.h - contains the definitions and declarations shared by
> >> dw-i3c-master and dw-i3c-platdrv
> >>
> >> This patch will allow SOC integrators to add their code specific to
> >> DesignWare I3C IP.
> > Isn't it too early to do this change? Can't we wait until we have a SoC
> > that actually embeds this IP?
>
>
> I'm trying to turn it more flexible so the other can reuse the code.
Looking at the separation you've done here, I don't see why you need
it. All the resources you request are generic, so why not just adding a
new compat in the of_match_table?
>
>
> >
> >> Signed-off-by: Vitor Soares <soares@...opsys.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/i3c/master/Kconfig | 9 +-
> >> drivers/i3c/master/Makefile | 5 +-
> >> drivers/i3c/master/dw-i3c-core.h | 214 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> drivers/i3c/master/dw-i3c-master.c | 299 ++----------------------------------
> >> drivers/i3c/master/dw-i3c-platdrv.c | 112 ++++++++++++++
Just realized the driver is named dw-i3c-master, while the cadence
driver is named i3c-master-cdns.c. I'll send a patch to make that
consistent and follow the initial naming scheme: i3c-master-<ipname>.c.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists