linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: i2c: Use correct vendor prefix for Atmel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181123124730.GA21651@ulmo>
Date:   Fri, 23 Nov 2018 13:47:30 +0100
From:   Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To:     Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
        "linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: i2c: Use correct vendor prefix for Atmel

On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 12:40:19PM +0000, Peter Rosin wrote:
> On 2018-11-23 13:10, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > From: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
> > 
> > The "at," prefix was never correct for Atmel, so fix the few occurrences
> > that got it wrong. Use "atmel," instead.
> 
> Fully agreed. However, given that atmel,24c08 is documented in .../eeprom/at24.txt
> I think it would be better to remove at,24c08 from trivial-devices.txt

Good point, will respin.

Thanks,
Thierry

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)