[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a3bCK4MxXoCmzfdgvELz9dNgOkACb1Gzpf8vRH8Cd-FnA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2018 22:47:42 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: otavio.salvador@...ystems.com.br
Cc: otavio@...ystems.com.br, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-imx@....com, Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] ARM: imx_v6_v7_defconfig: Remove explicit
ARM_UNWIND disable
On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 10:45 PM Otavio Salvador
<otavio.salvador@...ystems.com.br> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 7:35 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 10:24 PM Otavio Salvador
> > <otavio@...ystems.com.br> wrote:
> > >
> > > CONFIG_ARM_UNWIND is removed when running 'savedefconfig', but
> > > selected by the Kconfig logic. This is done in preparation to making
> > > further changes to this defconfig cleaner.
> > >
> >
> > Does this mean we no longer get the unwinder, or there is some other
> > config (which?) that unconditionally selects it?
>
> It is selected. Before changing the defconfig I did a savedefconfig to
> avoid unrelated changes to be included on the subsequent patches and
> then I found it was now selected.
Ok, then please mention in the changelog which other option selects it,
as I said.
Aside from that, your series looks fine to me.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists