[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAP9ODKr3kQjEcKGwiVpsnFTFEEzjTxP0HdJYsQuc7jvqLEBypA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2018 20:21:27 -0200
From: Otavio Salvador <otavio.salvador@...ystems.com.br>
To: arnd@...db.de
Cc: Otavio Salvador <otavio@...ystems.com.br>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] ARM: imx_v6_v7_defconfig: Remove explicit
ARM_UNWIND disable
Hello Arnd,
On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 7:48 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 10:45 PM Otavio Salvador
> <otavio.salvador@...ystems.com.br> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 7:35 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> > > On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 10:24 PM Otavio Salvador
> > > <otavio@...ystems.com.br> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > CONFIG_ARM_UNWIND is removed when running 'savedefconfig', but
> > > > selected by the Kconfig logic. This is done in preparation to making
> > > > further changes to this defconfig cleaner.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Does this mean we no longer get the unwinder, or there is some other
> > > config (which?) that unconditionally selects it?
> >
> > It is selected. Before changing the defconfig I did a savedefconfig to
> > avoid unrelated changes to be included on the subsequent patches and
> > then I found it was now selected.
>
> Ok, then please mention in the changelog which other option selects it,
> as I said.
>
> Aside from that, your series looks fine to me.
Thank you for reviewing it. I sent a v3 mentioning it.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 (53) 9 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750
Powered by blists - more mailing lists