lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 26 Nov 2018 13:59:24 -0800
From:   Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Kees Cook <keescook@...gle.com>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the f2fs tree

Hi Stephen,

On 11/26, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Jaegeuk,
> 
> After merging the f2fs tree, today's linux-next build
> (x86_64_allmodconfig) produced this warning:
> 
> In file included from fs/f2fs/dir.c:11:
> fs/f2fs/f2fs.h: In function '__mark_inode_dirty_flag':
> fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2388:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>    if (set)
>       ^
> fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2390:2: note: here
>   case FI_DATA_EXIST:
>   ^~~~
> 
> Exposed by my use of -Wimplicit-fallthrough
> 
> I am not sure why this has turned up now (as opposed to earlier today).

The above change had been there for a long time, as an intended behavior.
Hmm, I'm not sure how to avoid this.

Thanks,

> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ