[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181126091838.slfra2ncsvewhyqp@pengutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 10:18:38 +0100
From: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Lothar Waßmann <LW@...O-electronics.de>
Cc: Vokáč Michal <Michal.Vokac@...ft.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org>,
Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...ess.pl>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
viresh kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [RCF PATCH,v2,2/2] pwm: imx: Configure output to GPIO in
disabled state
Hallo Lothar,
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 10:11:16AM +0100, Lothar Waßmann wrote:
> Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de> wrote:
> > @Lothar: if Michal did something different than you expected, please
> > tell us with a few more details.
>
> No, Michal's findings are in sync with what I checked here.
so this is a confirmation that the gpio handling cannot be dropped,
right?
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists