linux-kernel - Re: [patch V2 24/28] x86/speculation: Prepare arch_smt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c883e673-0175-2d3f-5703-eab4c3a792be@amd.com>
Date:   Tue, 27 Nov 2018 21:20:48 +0000
From:   "Lendacky, Thomas" <Thomas.Lendacky@....com>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
        Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        Casey Schaufler <casey.schaufler@...el.com>,
        Asit Mallick <asit.k.mallick@...el.com>,
        Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>,
        Waiman Long <longman9394@...il.com>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Dave Stewart <david.c.stewart@...el.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [patch V2 24/28] x86/speculation: Prepare arch_smt_update() for
 PRCTL mode

On 11/27/2018 02:30 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Nov 2018, Lendacky, Thomas wrote:
>> On 11/25/2018 12:33 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>> +/* Update x86_spec_ctrl_base in case SMT state changed. */
>>> +static void update_stibp_strict(void)
>>>  {
>>> -	wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL, x86_spec_ctrl_base);
>>> +	u64 mask = x86_spec_ctrl_base & ~SPEC_CTRL_STIBP;
>>> +
>>> +	if (sched_smt_active())
>>> +		mask |= SPEC_CTRL_STIBP;
>>> +
>>> +	if (mask == x86_spec_ctrl_base)
>>> +		return;
>>> +
>>> +	pr_info("Spectre v2 user space SMT mitigation: STIBP %s\n",
>>> +		mask & SPEC_CTRL_STIBP ? "always-on" : "off");
>>> +	x86_spec_ctrl_base = mask;
>>> +	on_each_cpu(update_stibp_msr, NULL, 1);
>>
>> Some more testing using spectre_v2_user=on and I've found that during boot
>> up, once the first SMT thread is encountered no more updates to MSRs for
>> STIBP are done for any CPUs brought up after that. The first SMT thread
>> will cause mask != x86_spec_ctrl_base, but then x86_spec_ctrl_base is set
>> to mask and the check always causes a return for subsequent CPUs that are
>> brought up.
> 
> The above code merily handles the switch between SMT and non-SMT mode,
> because there all other online CPUs need to be updated, but after that each
> upcoming CPU calls x86_spec_ctrl_setup_ap() which will write the MSR. So
> it's all good.

Yup, sorry for the noise. Trying to test different scenarios using some
code hacks and put them in the wrong place, so wasn't triggering the
WRMSR in x86_spec_ctrl_setup_ap().

Thanks,
Tom

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 	tglx
>