linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: sdm845: add video nodes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 27 Nov 2018 10:24:06 +0200
From:   Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.varbanov@...aro.org>
To:     Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...omium.org>, mgottam@...eaurora.org
Cc:     Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.varbanov@...aro.org>,
        Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, vgarodia@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: sdm845: add video nodes

Hi Alex,

On 11/27/18 9:31 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 7:08 PM Malathi Gottam <mgottam@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>>
>> This adds video nodes to sdm845 based on the examples
>> in the bindings.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Malathi Gottam <mgottam@...eaurora.org>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
>> index 0c9a2aa..d82487d 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
>> @@ -84,6 +84,10 @@
>>                         reg = <0 0x86200000 0 0x2d00000>;
>>                         no-map;
>>                 };
>> +               venus_region: venus@...00000 {
>> +                       reg = <0x0 0x95800000 0x0 0x500000>;
> 
> Note that the driver expects a size of 0x600000 here and will fail to
> probe if this is smaller.
> 

I have to send a patch to fix that size mismatch as we discussed that it
the other mail thread.

-- 
regards,
Stan