lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 16 Jan 2019 11:44:07 +0200
From:   Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.varbanov@...aro.org>
To:     Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.varbanov@...aro.org>,
        Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...omium.org>,
        mgottam@...eaurora.org
Cc:     Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, vgarodia@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: sdm845: add video nodes

Hi Alex,

On 11/27/18 10:24 AM, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
> Hi Alex,
> 
> On 11/27/18 9:31 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 7:08 PM Malathi Gottam <mgottam@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> This adds video nodes to sdm845 based on the examples
>>> in the bindings.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Malathi Gottam <mgottam@...eaurora.org>
>>> ---
>>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>  1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
>>> index 0c9a2aa..d82487d 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
>>> @@ -84,6 +84,10 @@
>>>                         reg = <0 0x86200000 0 0x2d00000>;
>>>                         no-map;
>>>                 };
>>> +               venus_region: venus@...00000 {
>>> +                       reg = <0x0 0x95800000 0x0 0x500000>;
>>
>> Note that the driver expects a size of 0x600000 here and will fail to
>> probe if this is smaller.
>>
> 
> I have to send a patch to fix that size mismatch as we discussed that it
> the other mail thread.
>

I sent the size mismatch patch here:

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10753645/


-- 
regards,
Stan

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ