[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGp9LzoNKmJvTccQd7Syi_XMew4Mhf_tXsMAAZ+asE5btH9Dag@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 00:32:59 -0800
From: Sean Wang <sean.wang@...nel.org>
To: der.herr@...r.at
Cc: bgolaszewski@...libre.com,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sergio.paracuellos@...il.com,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
hofrat@...dl.org, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpio: mt7621: pass mediatek_gpio_bank_probe() failure
up the stack
>
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 11:49:26PM -0800, Sean Wang wrote:
> > Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@...dl.org> ??? 2018???11???21??? ?????? ??????10:13?????????
> > >
> > > The error cases of mediatek_gpio_bank_probe() would go unnoticed (except
> > > for the dev_err() messages). The probe function should return an error
> > > if one of the banks failed to initialize properly.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@...dl.org>
> > > Fixes: 4ba9c3afda41 ("gpio: mt7621: Add a driver for MT7621")
> > > ---
> > >
> > > Patch was compile tested with: omega2p_defconfig, SOC_MT7621=y,
> > > GPIOLIB=y, GPIO_MT7621=y
> > >
> > > Patch is against 4.20-rc3 (localversion-next is next-20181121)
> > >
> > > drivers/gpio/gpio-mt7621.c | 8 ++++++--
> > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mt7621.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mt7621.c
> > > index 1ec95bc..68fca8b 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mt7621.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mt7621.c
> > > @@ -297,6 +297,7 @@ mediatek_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> > > struct mtk *mtk;
> > > int i;
> > > + int ret;
> > >
> > > mtk = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*mtk), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > if (!mtk)
> > > @@ -311,8 +312,11 @@ mediatek_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > platform_set_drvdata(pdev, mtk);
> > > mediatek_gpio_irq_chip.name = dev_name(dev);
> > >
> > > - for (i = 0; i < MTK_BANK_CNT; i++)
> > > - mediatek_gpio_bank_probe(dev, np, i);
> > > + for (i = 0; i < MTK_BANK_CNT; i++) {
> > > + ret = mediatek_gpio_bank_probe(dev, np, i);
> > > + if (!ret)
> >
> > it should be if (ret < 0) ?
>
> I donĀ“t think so mediatek_gpio_bank_probe() returns 0 on success
> and all other returns are error paths - while the current code
> only returns negative values I do thik that any non 0 would be
> an error indication so !ret should be fine here.
>
!0 would be true
> thx!
> hofrat
>
> >
> > > + return ret;
> > > + }
> > >
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > > --
> > > 2.1.4
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Linux-mediatek mailing list
> > > Linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
> > > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-mediatek mailing list
> Linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
Powered by blists - more mailing lists