lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181127095843.GF19871@piout.net>
Date:   Tue, 27 Nov 2018 10:58:43 +0100
From:   Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
To:     richard.genoud@...il.com
Cc:     Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>,
        Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
        Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-serial@...r.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mario Forner <m.forner@...energy.com>
Subject: Re: DMA: atmel_serial: Opening and closing the serial device
 repeatedly causes kmalloc-32 slab leak

Hello Richard,

On 27/11/2018 10:51:13+0100, richard.genoud@...il.com wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I reproduced the memory leak on my board (at91sam9g35-cm) with a 4.20-rc3.
> 
> It triggered an OOM after a couple of hours running a code like this:
> #include <sys/types.h>
> #include <sys/stat.h>
> #include <fcntl.h>
> #include <unistd.h>
> 
> 
> int main(int argc, char **argv)
> {
> 	int fd;
> 	do {
> 		fd = open("/dev/ttyS1", O_RDONLY);
> 		close(fd);
> 	} while (true);
> 	return 0;
> }
> 
> As Mario pointed out, this only happens when atmel,use-dma-{r,t}x are
> used in the device-tree.
> 
> Adding:
> CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB=y
> CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB_LEAK=y
> Doesn't show anything suspect in /proc/slab_allocators
> 
> From what I found until now, it's something done in :
> dma_request_slave_channel();
> that leaks kmalloc-32
> Mabe I missed something, but it seems that everything DMA related is
> deallocated in atmel_release_{tx,rx}_dma().
> 
> Is this ringing a bell ?
> 

Yes, this is known issue and it has yet to be worked on.

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ