lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <febddc12-200d-139f-18f0-fcb055951324@sorico.fr>
Date:   Tue, 27 Nov 2018 11:46:56 +0100
From:   Richard Genoud <richard@...ico.fr>
To:     Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        richard.genoud@...il.com
Cc:     Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>,
        Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-serial@...r.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mario Forner <m.forner@...energy.com>,
        Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: DMA: atmel_serial: Opening and closing the serial device
 repeatedly causes kmalloc-32 slab leak

Le 27/11/2018 à 10:58, Alexandre Belloni a écrit :
> Hello Richard,
> 
> On 27/11/2018 10:51:13+0100, richard.genoud@...il.com wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I reproduced the memory leak on my board (at91sam9g35-cm) with a 4.20-rc3.
>>
>> It triggered an OOM after a couple of hours running a code like this:
>> #include <sys/types.h>
>> #include <sys/stat.h>
>> #include <fcntl.h>
>> #include <unistd.h>
>>
>>
>> int main(int argc, char **argv)
>> {
>> 	int fd;
>> 	do {
>> 		fd = open("/dev/ttyS1", O_RDONLY);
>> 		close(fd);
>> 	} while (true);
>> 	return 0;
>> }
>>
>> As Mario pointed out, this only happens when atmel,use-dma-{r,t}x are
>> used in the device-tree.
>>
>> Adding:
>> CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB=y
>> CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB_LEAK=y
>> Doesn't show anything suspect in /proc/slab_allocators
>>
>> From what I found until now, it's something done in :
>> dma_request_slave_channel();
>> that leaks kmalloc-32
>> Mabe I missed something, but it seems that everything DMA related is
>> deallocated in atmel_release_{tx,rx}_dma().
>>
>> Is this ringing a bell ?
>>
> 
> Yes, this is known issue and it has yet to be worked on.
> 

After a talk on freenode, Alex found the problem.
A patch is on its way.

Thanks !

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ