[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181128202952.GA29570@zn.tnic>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 21:29:52 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: "Moger, Babu" <Babu.Moger@....com>
Cc: "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"fenghua.yu@...el.com" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
"reinette.chatre@...el.com" <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
"dan.carpenter@...cle.com" <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/resctrl: fix the uninitialized variable warning
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 08:15:02PM +0000, Moger, Babu wrote:
> Fix the compiler warning caused by a recent change.
Now take your time machine, send yourself 6 months into the future, look
at that commit message and try to remember what it was fixing. Can you?
I can't.
IOW, please summarize what smatch - the static checker not the compiler
- was complaining about and why this is a good fix.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists