[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5dde6770-ce7a-720a-f1db-56d9ef044a99@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 16:36:09 -0600
From: Jae Hyun Yoo <jae.hyun.yoo@...ux.intel.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
James Feist <james.feist@...ux.intel.com>,
Vernon Mauery <vernon.mauery@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH i2c-next v9 1/5] dt-bindings: i2c: Add 'bus-timeout-ms'
and '#retries' properties as common optional
On 11/28/2018 3:54 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 02:09:12PM -0700, Jae Hyun Yoo wrote:
>> This commit adds 'bus-timeout-ms' and '#retries' properties as
>> common optional properties that can be used for setting 'timeout'
>> and 'retries' values of 'struct i2c_adapter'. With this patch, the
>> bus timeout value and the master transfer retries count can be set
>> through these properties at the registration time of an adapter.
>> Still the values can be set by I2C_TIMEOUT and I2C_RETRIES ioctls
>> on cdev at runtime too.
>>
>> These properties may not be supported by all drivers. However, if
>> a driver wants to support one of them, it should adapt the
>> bindings in this document.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jae Hyun Yoo <jae.hyun.yoo@...ux.intel.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
>
> Definately NACK on the #retries part. This is purely a configuration
> thing. Besides that it is kind of ancient cruft, too. I don't recommend
> it, at all.
>
> On the timeout thing, I am still not fully convinced that this is a HW
> description. I said that before. But maybe I need to understand your
> problem case better.
>
Okay, I got it. I'll leave those as configuration things. Will remove
this part in the next version.
Thanks for your comment.
Jae
Powered by blists - more mailing lists