linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 41/41] scsi: xen-scsifront: mark expected switch fall-through

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a17db312-3e7c-113b-a8a1-ff444322c233@suse.com>
Date:   Wed, 28 Nov 2018 07:03:02 +0100
From:   Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
To:     "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
        Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
        Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
        xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org
Cc:     "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 41/41] scsi: xen-scsifront: mark expected switch
 fall-through

On 28/11/2018 05:34, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
> where we are expecting to fall through.
> 
> Notice that, in this particular case, I replaced
> "Missed the backend's Closing state -- fallthrough" with
> "fall through - Missed the backend's Closing state", which
> contains the "fall through" annotation at the beginnig of
> the code comment, which is what GCC is expecting to find.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>

Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>


Juergen