[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <SN6PR04MB4925E511F16036DF52A6FFA7FCD10@SN6PR04MB4925.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 06:15:41 +0000
From: Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@....com>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
Vinayak Holikatti <vinholikatti@...il.com>
CC: "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 40/41] scsi: ufs: ufshcd: mark expected switch
fall-throughs
Already submitted by Tomas:
https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-scsi/msg125659.html
Thanks,
Avri
> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-scsi-owner@...r.kernel.org <linux-scsi-owner@...r.kernel.org>
> On Behalf Of Gustavo A. R. Silva
> Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2018 6:34 AM
> To: Vinayak Holikatti <vinholikatti@...il.com>
> Cc: James E.J. Bottomley <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>; Martin K. Petersen
> <martin.petersen@...cle.com>; linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org; linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org; Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
> Subject: [PATCH 40/41] scsi: ufs: ufshcd: mark expected switch fall-throughs
>
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
> where we are expecting to fall through.
>
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1087954 ("Missing break in switch")
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> index 003d489f1b4b..be207197b63f 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> @@ -1551,6 +1551,7 @@ int ufshcd_hold(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool async)
> * currently running. Hence, fall through to cancel gating
> * work and to enable clocks.
> */
> + /* fall through */
> case CLKS_OFF:
> ufshcd_scsi_block_requests(hba);
> hba->clk_gating.state = REQ_CLKS_ON;
> @@ -1562,6 +1563,7 @@ int ufshcd_hold(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool async)
> * fall through to check if we should wait for this
> * work to be done or not.
> */
> + /* fall through */
> case REQ_CLKS_ON:
> if (async) {
> rc = -EAGAIN;
> @@ -4620,6 +4622,7 @@ ufshcd_scsi_cmd_status(struct ufshcd_lrb *lrbp,
> int scsi_status)
> switch (scsi_status) {
> case SAM_STAT_CHECK_CONDITION:
> ufshcd_copy_sense_data(lrbp);
> + /* fall through */
> case SAM_STAT_GOOD:
> result |= DID_OK << 16 |
> COMMAND_COMPLETE << 8 |
> --
> 2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists