[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4gBwtCxN4xTncsyShMwMzNiLG3SxKA-frYh9Fn-f6QV=g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 08:33:55 -0800
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dax: Fix Xarray conversion of dax_unlock_mapping_entry()
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 8:24 AM Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 07:54:49AM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> > Looks good to me, although can we make that cookie an actual type? I
> > think it's mostly ok to pass around (void *) for 'entry' inside of
> > fs/dax.c, but once an entry leaves that file I'd like it to have an
> > explicit type to catch people that might accidentally pass a (struct
> > page *) to the unlock routine.
>
> That's a really good idea. Something like this?
>
> typedef struct {
> void *v;
> } dax_entry_t;
Yes, please.
> I could see us making good use of that within dax.c.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists