lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181203061148.GF427@jagdpanzerIV>
Date:   Mon, 3 Dec 2018 15:11:48 +0900
From:   Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To:     Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Joey Pabalinas <joeypabalinas@...il.com>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 7/7] zram: writeback throttle

On (12/03/18 15:02), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> Seems like I misread writeback_limit_store() a bit.
> 
> So, if I want to, say, let only 10M of writteback pages, I need to
> do
> 
> 	echo 0 > writeback_limit
> 	echo 10M > writeback_limit_store	// memparse format is for
> 						// simplicity only; I know
> 						// it should be in 4K units.
> 
> every day. How about dropping the "echo 0" and ->stop_writeback?

Ah, this breaks the unlimited writeback.
So, nevermind my comment.

	-ss

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ