[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8d8e860d-f9a4-6708-ccab-d47180f0ad0a@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2018 10:53:32 +0800
From: Xunlei Pang <xlpang@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm/memcg: Avoid reclaiming below hard protection
On 2018/12/3 PM 7:57, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 03-12-18 16:01:19, Xunlei Pang wrote:
>> When memcgs get reclaimed after its usage exceeds min, some
>> usages below the min may also be reclaimed in the current
>> implementation, the amount is considerably large during kswapd
>> reclaim according to my ftrace results.
>
> And here again. Describe the setup and the behavior please?
>
step 1
mkdir -p /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/online
cd /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/online
echo 512M > memory.max
echo 409600000 > memory.min
echo $$ > tasks
dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/null
while true; do sleep 1; cat memory.current ; cat memory.min; done
step 2
create global memory pressure by allocating annoymous and cached
pages to constantly trigger kswap: dd if=/dev/sdb of=/dev/null
step 3
Then observe "online" groups, hundreds of kbytes a little over
memory.min can cause tens of MiB to be reclaimed by kswapd.
Here is one of test results I got:
cat memory.current; cat memory.min; echo;
409485312 // current
409600000 // min
385052672 // See current got over reclaimed for 23MB
409600000 // min
Its corresponding ftrace output I monitored:
kswapd_0-281 [000] .... 304.706632: shrink_node_memcg:
min_excess=24, nr_reclaimed=6013, sc->nr_to_reclaim=1499997, exceeds
5989pages
Powered by blists - more mailing lists