linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] printk: don't unconditionally shortcut print

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 4 Dec 2018 11:56:14 +0900
From:   Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To:     Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>
Cc:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk: don't unconditionally shortcut print_time()

On (12/02/18 14:02), Tetsuo Handa wrote:
>  
> @@ -1541,11 +1545,13 @@ int do_syslog(int type, char __user *buf, int len, int source)
>  		} else {
>  			u64 seq = syslog_seq;
>  			u32 idx = syslog_idx;
> +			bool f = syslog_partial ? syslog_time : printk_time;
			^^^^^^

>  			while (seq < log_next_seq) {
>  				struct printk_log *msg = log_from_idx(idx);
>  
> -				error += msg_print_text(msg, true, NULL, 0);
> +				error += msg_print_text(msg, true, f, NULL, 0);
								^^^^

> +				f = printk_time;
				^^^

>  				idx = log_next(idx);
>  				seq++;

Can we please have something better than 'f'?

	-ss