[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181204143830.6c7f8910@vmware.local.home>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2018 14:38:30 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Subject: Re: Strange hang with gcc 8 of kprobe multiple_kprobes test
On Tue, 4 Dec 2018 09:15:06 +0100
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
> * Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > I remember I have fixed this, and actually WE did it :-D
> >
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/8/23/1203
> >
> > Ah, we hit a same bug...
> >
> > Ingo, could you pick the patch? Should I resend it?
>
> Indeed: I just picked it up into tip:perf/urgent.
>
> It's my bad: I missed the original submission due to Steve's feedback
> which I mistook as a request for another iteration, while he only
> commented on the reason for the original breakage and gave his
> Reviewed-by ...
>
Sorry for the confusion. The patch and code was quite complex, and I
was documenting what I thought of the patch (and the bug), so that my
Reviewed-by had a bit more meaning.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists