[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181209220127.GA84159@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2018 23:01:27 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Subject: Re: Strange hang with gcc 8 of kprobe multiple_kprobes test
* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Dec 2018 09:15:06 +0100
> Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > * Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > > I remember I have fixed this, and actually WE did it :-D
> > >
> > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/8/23/1203
> > >
> > > Ah, we hit a same bug...
> > >
> > > Ingo, could you pick the patch? Should I resend it?
> >
> > Indeed: I just picked it up into tip:perf/urgent.
> >
> > It's my bad: I missed the original submission due to Steve's feedback
> > which I mistook as a request for another iteration, while he only
> > commented on the reason for the original breakage and gave his
> > Reviewed-by ...
> >
>
> Sorry for the confusion. The patch and code was quite complex, and I
> was documenting what I thought of the patch (and the bug), so that my
> Reviewed-by had a bit more meaning.
It was totally welcome when I read it the second time - and it's my bad I
was reading too quickly first time around ;-)
So please keep doing it whenever you find the time! :)
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists