[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b44225b8e243a70c6ab63a40a3de630d@codeaurora.org>
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2018 17:29:02 +0800
From: yuankuiz@...eaurora.org
To: a.zummo@...ertech.it, alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com
Cc: linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] rtc: proc: printf using alarm for alrm
Hi,
From 549bae59445c5ec67dd6a46f3ea4f58966d40c9b
Current the struct rtc_wkalrm is dumped as
"alrm_" by printing converted from the struct
name of "alrm.*" directly. Shall we use the
"alarm *" to replace the "alrm_*" during this
dumping?
Signed-off-by: John Zhao <yuankuiz@...eaurora.org>
---
drivers/rtc/rtc-proc.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-proc.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-proc.c
index a9dd921..d4a3c91 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-proc.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-proc.c
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ static int rtc_proc_show(struct seq_file *seq, void
*offset)
err = rtc_read_alarm(rtc, &alrm);
if (err == 0) {
- seq_printf(seq, "alrm_time\t: ");
+ seq_printf(seq, "alarm time\t: ");
if ((unsigned int)alrm.time.tm_hour <= 24)
seq_printf(seq, "%02d:", alrm.time.tm_hour);
else
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ static int rtc_proc_show(struct seq_file *seq, void
*offset)
else
seq_printf(seq, "**\n");
- seq_printf(seq, "alrm_date\t: ");
+ seq_printf(seq, "alarm date\t: ");
if ((unsigned int)alrm.time.tm_year <= 200)
seq_printf(seq, "%04d-", alrm.time.tm_year + 1900);
else
@@ -85,9 +85,9 @@ static int rtc_proc_show(struct seq_file *seq, void
*offset)
seq_printf(seq, "%02d\n", alrm.time.tm_mday);
else
seq_printf(seq, "**\n");
- seq_printf(seq, "alarm_IRQ\t: %s\n",
+ seq_printf(seq, "alarm IRQ\t: %s\n",
alrm.enabled ? "yes" : "no");
- seq_printf(seq, "alrm_pending\t: %s\n",
+ seq_printf(seq, "alarm pending\t: %s\n",
alrm.pending ? "yes" : "no");
seq_printf(seq, "update IRQ enabled\t: %s\n",
(rtc->uie_rtctimer.enabled) ? "yes" : "no");
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists