linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] rtc: proc: printf using alarm for alrm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <acac27b279864ff8f938f79bcc49b238@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Thu, 06 Dec 2018 15:22:51 +0800
From:   yuankuiz@...eaurora.org
To:     a.zummo@...ertech.it, alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com
Cc:     linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-rtc-owner@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc: proc: printf using alarm for alrm

Hi,

     Kindly, this format change formats the rtc dump from:
         alrm_time	: 00:00:00
         alrm_date	: 1970-01-01
         alarm_IRQ	: no
         alrm_pending	: no

     to:
         alarm time	: 00:00:00
         alarm date	: 1970-01-01
         alarm IRQ	: no
         alarm pending	: no

     Thanks,
BR//John Zhao

On 2018-12-04 05:29 PM, yuankuiz@...eaurora.org wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> From 549bae59445c5ec67dd6a46f3ea4f58966d40c9b
> 
> Current the struct rtc_wkalrm is dumped as
> "alrm_" by printing converted from the struct
> name of "alrm.*" directly. Shall we use the
> "alarm *" to replace the "alrm_*" during this
> dumping?
> 
> Signed-off-by: John Zhao <yuankuiz@...eaurora.org>
> ---
>  drivers/rtc/rtc-proc.c | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-proc.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-proc.c
> index a9dd921..d4a3c91 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-proc.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-proc.c
> @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ static int rtc_proc_show(struct seq_file *seq, void 
> *offset)
> 
>  	err = rtc_read_alarm(rtc, &alrm);
>  	if (err == 0) {
> -		seq_printf(seq, "alrm_time\t: ");
> +		seq_printf(seq, "alarm time\t: ");
>  		if ((unsigned int)alrm.time.tm_hour <= 24)
>  			seq_printf(seq, "%02d:", alrm.time.tm_hour);
>  		else
> @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ static int rtc_proc_show(struct seq_file *seq, void 
> *offset)
>  		else
>  			seq_printf(seq, "**\n");
> 
> -		seq_printf(seq, "alrm_date\t: ");
> +		seq_printf(seq, "alarm date\t: ");
>  		if ((unsigned int)alrm.time.tm_year <= 200)
>  			seq_printf(seq, "%04d-", alrm.time.tm_year + 1900);
>  		else
> @@ -85,9 +85,9 @@ static int rtc_proc_show(struct seq_file *seq, void 
> *offset)
>  			seq_printf(seq, "%02d\n", alrm.time.tm_mday);
>  		else
>  			seq_printf(seq, "**\n");
> -		seq_printf(seq, "alarm_IRQ\t: %s\n",
> +		seq_printf(seq, "alarm IRQ\t: %s\n",
>  				alrm.enabled ? "yes" : "no");
> -		seq_printf(seq, "alrm_pending\t: %s\n",
> +		seq_printf(seq, "alarm pending\t: %s\n",
>  				alrm.pending ? "yes" : "no");
>  		seq_printf(seq, "update IRQ enabled\t: %s\n",
>  			(rtc->uie_rtctimer.enabled) ? "yes" : "no");